A “Consciousness Label”?

Thinking is good, but unfortunately, it doesn’t pay the bills.

Unless you go to extremes or simply have the means from the start, you cannot escape this rule: you need money to live. And you need to live in order to think.

It’s true that the opposite isn’t necessarily true. But isn’t it because human beings can think that the standard of living has evolved—presumably for the better—over the years?

One thing, however, hasn’t changed: our relationship with reflection, at least among “the masses.” The system is well-structured enough to ensure that the masses don’t think. And it’s not their “fault”—society is designed this way.

By doing their best at work, taking care of their children and family, trying to stay in touch with two or three friends, and occasionally having a bit of fun in the evening or on weekends (if they’ve worked too much overtime), people don’t really have the time—or for many, the desire—to ask themselves existential questions.

When we want to “entertain” ourselves, philosophy or studying are not natural options. And even before that, why do we feel the need to be entertained in the first place?

For many, it’s to pass the time, to fill the void, to avoid thinking.

Because thinking often hurts. It means realizing that we could do better, that we messed up in the past, and that we could have done things differently. And it means potentially worrying about things that may or may not happen—things we ultimately have no certainty about.

And the cycle repeats.

“So we dance,” as someone once said. We drink, we complain about a job we don’t necessarily like, about a relationship that no longer satisfies us. We also laugh—a lot. Laugh at politicians who do nothing, saying that if we were in their place, things would be better. Laugh at a person sitting alone at the bar because they have no friends. Laugh because someone drank too much and threw up on themselves.

And it’s already late. We have to work the next day.

Hungover in the morning, we scroll on our phones to wake up. We ignore anything that would make us think—it’s too annoying. We lose track of time and end up running late for work. We don’t necessarily like this job, but it pays the bills—the “lifeblood of war.” Along the way, we read a few motivational posts: “Be positive,” “Exercise,” “Meditate.” True messages in principle, but they only work if we’ve already taken the time to reflect on them. And we haven’t.

All this to say—what if we had labels on places, businesses, products, films, books, manga, music—everything, really—that indicate the “level of consciousness” they provide?

My theory is that what is good for the brain helps raise awareness, and for some products, this is obvious.

Today, for example, I wrote a post about Schindler’s List.

A movie is entertainment. But a movie about the Holocaust is not the same as a 90s action film (and yes, I can already hear people arguing—but it’s just an example). Schindler’s List would therefore have “more consciousness points” than an action movie.

The same applies to apps. A gacha game app is extremely harmful to the brain because it creates addiction—negative points.
An ad-free app that promotes health would earn positive points.

Governments should be tied to these “scores”—but without corruption or lobbying. A paradox, of course, to even say “government without corruption.”

Anyway, I don’t have time anymore—writing doesn’t feed me. Yet?


Our latest tales

  • Pure and innocent

    Pure and innocent

    If there is one thing we can all learn from children, it is their ability to see the world with pure and innocent eyes. Their questions often feel naïve, yet they describe very well how a heart that is still pure and innocent sees the world around us. The Seven Shapes understood one thing: for

    Read more

  • Education First

    Education First

    The world is filled with countless mysteries yet to be discovered, and with so many things that have been learned through the years since the beginning of civilizations. Not only for adults, but even more so for newly born Espers, it can feel overwhelming. That’s why Vati and the other Shapes believed that education needed

    Read more

  • Trade-off

    Trade-off

    Atma found in Shala the figure of an older sister, someone with whom she could share her vision of the world. As the Shape of Balance, Atma was there to help the Espers remember that balance was essential for a bright StarDust. But she couldn’t help them directly—they had to understand and act on their

    Read more

  • Once in a Lifetime

    Once in a Lifetime

    Shala would ask the young Espers what came to their minds when thinking about events that occur only once in a lifetime. A very intrepid child replied first: “The birth of my younger sister!” “Indeed, the birth of a new life is something that becomes a great challenge for the parents.” Vati added: “Raising a

    Read more

  • As One

    As One

    The message of One Daily Tale was simple. The Five Elements working together in balance were the key to a bright StarDust for an Esper. This led to an Esper who could now consciously face his inner Shadow—something hidden from him without the light of his own StarDust. Those enlightened Espers could become living examples

    Read more

  • Consistency of words and actions

    Consistency of words and actions

    After they created One Daily Tale, the Seven Shapes knew this was only the first step toward a peaceful Esperia. “From now on, the real challenge begins,” thought Vati, who understood better than anyone that while truth could be written with words, actions and behaviors did not always follow naturally. This was when Faya stepped

    Read more

  • Gratitude for basic needs

    Gratitude for basic needs

    There was a saying that Kenko liked a lot, and though it did not directly concern health, she appreciated the idea behind it, as it reflected the principles taught by the other Shapes as well. “You should be grateful for the little things you receive — whether it is simple lodging or a meal.” Kenko

    Read more

  • Third Eye

    Third Eye

    Eklea liked to use concrete examples to explain abstract notions that were difficult to grasp, especially for the younger Espers. This time, she used the example of a one-versus-one game played by two Espers. The game had a lot of depth, and a well-timed move could completely change the tide of the match. She said,

    Read more